Monash University
Browse
monash_110309.pdf (2.1 MB)

Pronominal address in German: rules, anarchy and embarrassment potential

Download (2.1 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2017-05-02, 03:54 authored by Kretzenbacher, Heinz L, Clyne, Michael, Schpbach, Doris
Choice of address forms, a socially crucial feature in German communication, is context-dependent on situations (a) where the unmarked form of address is du (T), (b) where it is Sie (V), and (c) where the two systems (a and b) coexist. The first two situations are, apart from their fuzzy edges, rather clearcut. The third situation, however, appears anarchic and has a high embarrassment potential. In an empirical study based on 72 interviews conducted in three regions of the German speaking area, the three prototypical situations are explored. A number of potentially conflicting rules and preferences for ambiguity are isolated. These include individual preferences, network preferences and perceptions of social distance, based on factors such as relative age, emotional closeness of interlocutors, and perceived commonalities between them. In spite of the complex interplay of competing rules and preferences and the consequent embarrassment potential, German speakers appear to reject any imposition from outside of a particular address form. This study is part of a larger, Australian-based project comparing the address systems of French, German and Swedish. Copyright 2006 Heinz L. Kretzenbacher, Michael Clyne and Doris Schpbach. No part of this article may be reproduced by any means without the written consent of the publisher.

History

Date originally published

2006

Source

Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, vol. 29, no. 2 (2006), p. 17.1-17.18. ISSN 1833-7139

Usage metrics

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC